Skip to content
  • Meeting Tips

Ending Meetings Early: Maybe Not Always A Good Thing

By Jeffrey Steinke

An empty modern conference room with rolling chairs around a long table and floor-to-ceiling windows

Photo by Benjamin Child on Unsplash

This week I met with my project team to try to diffuse an important issue. I scheduled a 30 minute meeting with the following agenda:

A Less Meeting agenda with three items, each given a length in minutes, totalling 30 minutes

Well, a few minutes in one of my colleagues asked, “Why don’t we just do this…”, an option that was not even thought of originally, but one that ultimately made the most sense.

The 30 minute meeting quickly ended in 12 minutes as we all agreed on the proposed solution. After the meeting ended someone said to me, “we should get a really good Meeting Quality Score for this meeting because we ended so early.” When I replied that it’s a good thing we didn’t ended the meeting 2 minutes earlier or we would have gotten NEGATIVE points for ending too early, I was confronted with an interesting question: Why would ending a meeting 20+ minutes early be a bad thing?

A Meeting Quality Score of 66 out of 100, with 10 points deducted for finishing more than 20 minutes early

A Meeting Quality Score of 81 out of 100, with 10 points awarded for finishing 10 minutes early

We think that there are two main reasons why ending meetings much earlier than scheduled is a bad thing:

  1. When you schedule a 40 minute meeting for 60 minutes, people tend to take up the full 60 minutes when all they needed was 40. It is human nature to think “we have plenty of time left in this meeting, so let’s talk about something else that isn’t even on the agenda.” And who said that meetings have to be 30, or 60 minutes long? What’s wrong with a 25 minute meeting?
  2. If you are consistently scheduling meetings longer than they need to be, then you are preventing your attendees from being able to accurately schedule the rest of their day. They may have been able to schedule something else in that time frame had you scheduled your meeting correctly.

The idea behind the Meeting Quality Score (MQS) is to drive people to have better and more effective meetings, which is the goal of LessMeeting. If the MQS can identify areas of improvement, such as doing a better job scheduling meetings, then it’s helping LessMeeting achieve that goal.

While ending one meeting much earlier than it was scheduled for isn’t a bad thing (in fact I think it’s a good thing), mis-scheduling meetings consistently is a cause for concern.

Share

keep reading

Browse all posts →